New Thought Movement is an international movement that try to reconsider common thoughts about different concepts. Bellow explanation about the goal from this movement (concept "love"):
New musings can come from taking another point of view on things. A way to do that is to test the presumptions that exist. For instance, is love truly a feeling of yearning or connection? This is a normal surmise, yet suppose it is possible that we test this.
New Thoughts on Love
yearning and connection could be solid feelings, and they are frequently called love. In any case, connection could be for awful explanations too, isn't that so? yearning too can originate from less than honorable places. What is a sibstitute meaning of love?
What about a distinguishment of value? Seeing the natural value in someone, like the magnificence you see in a painting or catch in a tune. You don't have to be attached or even burning of beauty to appreciate it. You simply need to acknowledge it. The pleasure that you take in an another's being then could be a meaning of love. Anyhow the feeling.
love is more than a feeling however. What amount of fondness does a mother have for her kids assuming that she feels affectionate towards them, yet doesn't nourish them? Cherish in this connection needs to incorporate action, isn't that right?
This is reconsidering "love" for New Thought Movement.
This focuses up the legitimate issue with determining terms like love. There are seven or eight or maybe a hundred terms we need to create. They are every distinctive, yet we have only one expression for them. Possibly instead of re-demarcating love we need to make twelve new statements. Notwithstanding there's a territory for some new musings.
Random New Thoughts
An additional route to have new musings is to only search for new thoughts to supplant old ones. At that point you develop the new thought, to see what esteem you may find in it. Here are a few illustrations of new considerations, without developing them (cause yourself).
-Why do we sway uniformed individuals to vote? Perhaps its better to urge individuals Not to vote, unless they are eager to instruct themselves on the issues.
-Is multi-tasking truly an indication of proficiency? Perhaps the way that we need to be so occupied simply to get what we need shows that our activities aren't successful sufficiently.
-Why would we be able to pay less for a surgeon who executes more individuals on the working table? Why not distinguish that there are better and more regrettable specialists, have that qualified information accessible, and pay likewise?
-How about miracle as a substitute for trust? Trust is simply accepting without explanation for why. Miracle is to wonder about the planet and acknowledge that we don't have explanations or clarifications for everything.
At long last, suppose it is possible that our level of innovativeness, and capability to have new musings isn't simply something that is situated at life commencement. Consider the possibility that it is a deliberate process, one that may not be distinguished by those who utilization it, yet might be recognized and replicated. Every last one of us can prepare ourselves to have inventive new considerations.
